Improve Lighting & Environmental SystemsĬreative office space design can dramatically improve lighting and environmental system efficiency (e.g. Rather, they should shift towards creative office space design so they can drive innovation, performance, employee engagement, customer service, and bottom-line results.īelow, we highlight 3 key ways that businesses in so-called “boring industries” can (appropriately!) spice things up through creative office design: 1. However, while many industries are just fine being staid and conventional – and in fact, wouldn’t have it any other way – that doesn’t mean they should cling to the status quo, design-wise. And frankly, this isn’t necessarily a negative thing – at least not entirely.įor example, do we really want companies that manufacturer caskets and funeral urns to have foosball tables in the staff lounge? And is it a good sign (pun intended!) if life insurance companies have 10-foot tall flashing neon signs that blink “Come In, We’re Open”? Recently, additional buildings have been added to the factory site to handle robotic assembly of the 777's fuselage and fabrication of the composite wing of the 777X, according to Reese.Let’s face it: some industries continue to be perceived as a bit on the boring side. The original building was expanded in 1978 to accommodate production of the Boeing 767, and then again in 1992 for the Boeing 777 program. (Seattle's relatively mild climate enables these measures to work just fine.) Conversely, if it gets too chilly, they turn on more of the overhead lights to heat the inside air. If it starts to get too warm inside, workers open the factory doors and use fans to draw air inside to cool the facility. One thing that the Everett factory doesn't have, though, is air conditioning. It has its own fire department, banks, day care facilities, a fully-equipped medical clinic and a water treatment plant. Inside, the Everett plant is the equivalent of a small city, with 36,000 workers on site every day, according to a fact sheet provided by Boeing. They use 1,300 bicycles and tricycles to cover the distances more quickly. Under the floor, there's an elaborate 2.33-mile (3.7 kilometers) system of tunnels, which contain the water, sewer and electrical utilities, and also allow workers to move around the facility without getting in the way of aircraft production, according to Reese. (The aircraft are assembled on a production line that moves about an inch-and-a-half (3.8 centimeters) per minute, as this August 2018 CNN article details.) Inside, the plant has 26 overhead cranes that run on 39 miles (62.7 kilometers) of ceiling tracks, which lift and move big pieces and sections of planes as they're being built. It has approximately 1 million overhead lights. VanDomelen, an information systems expert and aerospace enthusiast, who toured the factory a few years back.)Īccording to Reese, the ceiling is 90 feet (27.4 meters) above the factory floor - high enough to fit an eight-story office building inside. (For additional details, Reese recommended this blog post by J. "They can be opened with the simple push of a button and take about five minutes to open completely," David Reese, a Boeing's manager of visitor relations, said via email. "It was a tremendous feat of human resourcefulness, industry and tenacity," business journalist Russ Banham, author of the 2015 book "Higher: 100 Years of Boeing," explains in an interview. It all cost more than $1 billion - more than Boeing was worth at the time, according to this October 2013 Airways magazine article. A railroad spur had to be built to the site to rush building materials there and haul away debris. Working at breakneck speed, in a little more than a year, construction workers erected what was - and still is - the world's biggest factory. It was a remote area, filled with woods that were home to bears that occasionally had to be shooed away. Instead, the company ended up picking the site of a former military airport in Everett, 22 miles (35 kilometers) north of Seattle. Boeing considered building a new plant in California, but the 747's head engineer, Joe Sutter, reportedly argued against putting the facility that far away from Boeing's Seattle headquarters, because all that travel time might slow the project, according to this 2016 account in the Everett, Washington Herald.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |